Statments to think about

“The commonsense rules of the ‘real world’ are a fragile collection of socially reinforced illusions … Reality is negotiable. Outside of science and law, all rules can be bent or broken, and it doesn’t require being unethical.”

(Tim Ferriss, p 9 – 10 of the 4-Hour Work Week)

Come up with 10 examples of improving generally accepted customs that are regarded as “the preferred way” of doing things.

For example: 

1.  Tim Ferriss proposes a novel idea of scheduling regular “mini-retirements” throughout our working lives, where we take off 3 -12 months to have a total break from our regular work. The current practice is “deferred retirement”, where we work non-stop until we officially retire ( apart from the annual short holidays).

2. Rather than work focusing on the hours you work, work could focus on the amount of work you get done. If a person can do the required work in twenty hours a week, they can do so; and persons who need to take 60 hours can do so also. Current practice is for people to work to set hours – 9 till 5.

3. In the same vein, if the emphasis was on the work done, workers could choose where they work – at work, at home or even in another country — as long as their work got done. Current thinking is that workers must always work at the workplace under supervision — otherwise they won’t work hard enough.

4. And so on … human relationships, schooling, learning, cross-gender friendships.

The Leap Frog Game: seemingly impossible, but not if you approach it the right way

Leap Frog Game

Goal: Switch the frogs to the opposite side within two minutes.

Instructions:

1.  Click on a frog to begin.

2.  Click on the red arrow at bottom left to re-start the game.

Strategies to help you:

 

1. Believe the game is soluble. You may think, after a few tries, the game is impossible. It’s not.  Remember, mindset is everything: believe you can solve it and you probably will. Afterall, there are only just so many combinations of moves you can make!

2.  Don’t panic about how long it takes you. The goal is to solve it within 2 minutes. But life isn’t a speed test.  If it takes you two days  to solve it, that’s still good.

3.  Write down the sequences that don’t work. Eliminate the dud options so you don’t keep trying the same bad moves over and over.

4. Keep searching for the move you haven’t tried before.

5. When moving a frog, always keep in mind not to let two frogs of the same colour end up sitting next to each other. That’s a fatal error.

The solution:

Ask google. Type in leap frog solution. Several  youtubes will show you the answer. But don’t be tempted to look. Keep trying to solve it. You can solve it!  You just need to be systematic, exploratory and persistent!

How can I practise NOT being impulsive?

 Do the Idiot Test !

The Idiot Test is famous apparently.

It’s perfect for practising  NOT being impulsive.  It’s easy to do — as long as you think before responding!

It’s designed to trick you!

If you’re reckless and rush in with the wrong response, you’ll get sent back to the start.

I got sent back about 6 times! That’s when I realised, “What a brilliant game to teach caution and ‘looking before leaping'”!

Remember the wise advice:

There’s a space between stimulus and response — use it!

Good luck !

The original Idiot Test

If you enjoyed the Idiot Test, you  may want to do the The Ultimate Idiot Test too.

clever logic puzzles: the mathematician and the census officer

 

The mathematician and the census officer

A mathematician was greeted one day by a man taking a census at his door.

“Hello, how may I help you?” The mathematician greeted him cheerfully.

“Hello, I need to ask you a few questions. Firstly, are you married?” The mathematician nodded. “Do you have children?” Again, the mathematician shook his head yes. “How old are you children, what are their genders, and how many do you have?”

The mathematician’s eyes glinted with mischief. “I’m glad you asked. I have three daughters, and the product of their ages is 36.”

The man seemed flustered by this indirect answer. Thinking to himself, he realized he could not figure it out with only that knowledge. “I need more information to figure this out, sir.” He stated.

“Yes, you do.” The mathematician replied. He glanced at his house number. Pointing to it, he said, “That is the sum of my daughters’ ages.”

Accepting that he wasn’t going to get a straight answer out of the mathematician, he pulled out a pad of paper and a pencil, scribbled a few things, and then glanced at the house number. “That’s still not enough information, sir.”

“Of course,” the mathematician said, presently gripping the door, “I forgot to tell you that my oldest daughter has blue eyes.” And with that, he slammed the door in the man’s face.

The man squinted at his work, and then a look of realization crossed his face. He strode down the walk with a satisfied gait. He had figured out the ages.

HOW OLD ARE THE MATHEMATICIAN’S DAUGHTERS?

Before you start to solve this problem, apply these two smart strategies:

Strategy 1:

Write your thinking down on paper – be systematic and neat in your working out.

Strategy 2:

Believe the problem is soluble and that you can solve it.  Mindset is important when solving tough problems. It is toxic to tell yourself “This problem is missing vital information” or “I am too stupid to solve this!”

Now try to solve the problem. If you can’t solve it, after trying very hard,  work your way through strategies 3 to 5 as required.

Strategy 3: 

Work out all possible combinations of ages for the three daughters. There are 8 possibilities.

Strategy 4:

Work out the sums of all 8 possible age combinations.

Strategy 5:

Search for the useful implied clue contained in the statement about the eldest daughter having blue eyes.

Answer

The three daughters are aged . . .

9, 2 and 2.

Explanation

His 3 daughters’ ages multiply to be 36.

That means there are 8 possible combination:

36, 1, 1

18, 2,1

12, 3, 1

9, 2, 2

9, 4, 1

6, 6, 1

6, 3, 2

4, 3, 3

At first glance, knowing that their ages add up to the mathematician’s house number seems useless, since we aren’t told what the house number is. But we do know that the census guy knew what the house number was and that when he looked at his workings, he realised knowing the house number didn’t give him enough information. Maybe because some age combinations came up with the same answers.

Here are the values of the sums of the ages for the 8 possibilities:

36, 1, 1 = 38

18, 2,1 = 21

12, 3, 1 = 16

9, 2, 2 = 13

9, 4, 1 =15

6, 6, 1 =13

6, 3, 2 =11

4, 3, 3 =10

Note that  two age combinations add up to the same value:

 6+6 +1=13 

9+2+2= 13

So, we’ve got a pair of twins as  the eldest in the first case and a 9-year-old as the eldest in the second case.

We then hear that  his oldest daughter has blue eyes. That rules out the 6-year-old twins as they represent two eldest daughters!  So the correct age combination of the three daughters is 

a 9-year-old and a pair of 2-year-old twins!

from http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/12202-riddle-of-the-week/

 

Tantalising question:

Can someone teach us how to think? Is thinking a talent or a skill?

No-one seriously teaches us how to think.  But what if someone taught us a pile of thinking strategies and gave us enough problems to practise on and then suggested various strategies for us to try when we got stuck. Do you think  eventually we’d learn how to think better?

I think so! What do you think?

Riddles

  1. I get wetter the more I dry.

    hint: material

  2. What do you throw away the outside and cook the inside then you eat the outside and throw away the inside.

    hint: startchy vegetable

  3. I am far from the point. But I dont make mistakes, I fix yours.

    Hint: think of writing

Answers:

  1. teatowel
  2. corn
  3. eraser